Member discussion regarding the methods, varieties and merits of growing tomatoes.
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
March 19, 2007 | #46 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MO z6a near St. Louis
Posts: 1,349
|
Regarding the history of varieties aspect: Dice said
Quote:
For myself, I wouldn't mind a Sticky here on TV where one could drop the histories that do turn up. Not perfect, but it is something and I think many people would enjoy reading them.
__________________
--Ruth Some say the glass half-full. Others say the glass is half-empty. To an engineer, it’s twice as big as it needs to be. |
|
March 20, 2007 | #47 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upstate NY, zone 4b/5a
Posts: 21,169
|
Although, Suze's case is quite bad - if something like that had happened to me, I'd be likely very upset to say the least, not mentioning that other members might be requesting Suze's seeds from a wrong SSE members...
***** Thankfully Suze was able to work it out with the other SSE member so that all requests for those of her entries with that other person's code name will be forwarding Suze's requests to her.
__________________
Carolyn |
March 20, 2007 | #48 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minsk, Belarus, Eastern Europe (Zone 4a)
Posts: 2,278
|
My Zolotoe Serdtse tomato had been entered as Zolotoj Serdtse for some reason in 2007 SSE Yearbook, but I've sent all in Excel and with right name to Joanne
Somebody who corrected this don't know Russian grammer for sure
__________________
1 kg=2.2 lb , 1 m=39,37 in , 1 oz=28.35 g , 1 ft=30.48 cm , 1 lb= 0,4536 kg , 1 in=2.54 cm , 1 l = 0.26 gallon , 0 C=32 F Andrey a.k.a. TOMATODOR |
March 20, 2007 | #49 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 4,743
|
The suggestion that SSE have an online data entry
form for listed member submissions to the catalog could save SSE staff a lot of work and prevent a lot of the confusion described in the posts above, but it also raises security issues that they probably don't have now. (Becoming a listed member and mailing in a paper form would likely be considered too much trouble for ordinary malicious information vandals, but a form accessible on the Internet is quite a bit more convenient for creating havoc and wasting other people's time; cracking security is just part of the fun of it for high-tech juvenile delinquents). I am not saying, "Don't do it, it's not safe." I am only saying that the website and password security needs to be rigorous and professional if SSE wants to do this without creating problems that they don't have now.
__________________
-- alias |
March 21, 2007 | #50 |
Tomatoville® Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hendersonville, NC zone 7
Posts: 10,385
|
My gosh, I go away for a few days and a 5 page post pops up !!
So, good question - why is Cherokee Purple in the Pink section? Well, when I grew it out, it was really, aside from Purple Calabash, the only more on the purple-than-pink-side available - quickly followed by Black Krim and Price's Purple. And, back then, the Other Colors area seemed to be for greens and whites and bicolors. Once something gets in the yearbook in a particular place, it seems impossible or at least very difficult to move. Colors are tricky. Whenever I look through the yearbook, I note that quite a few tomatoes don't seem to be where they belong - new growers, especially, don't always get the pink/red distinction correct. I haven't checked recently, but the Brandywines were always a bit messy - quite a few listings under Red Brandywine were actually Brandywine. I often wonder if people just see colors slightly differently. So, would the SSE catalog benefit from expanding their color options - perhaps having a "black" section for tomatoes that retain chlorophyll upon ripening - with either yellow (brown color) or clear (purple color) skin....maybe a section called "Bicolors" for that collection? "White"? I think that, due to the large numbers of tomatoes offered, potential crosses or mixups, or as I said, challenge in differentiation, the tomato section will always be less than completely accurate. Man, it's good to be back home...
__________________
Craig |
March 21, 2007 | #51 | ||
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,027
|
Quote:
Quote:
I do wish my listing for Gary O hadn't been put in pink/purple, when I specifically and clearly listed it as "other". No idea what Robbins specified, but both our listings ended up in "pink/purple". Well, mine got put under another member code by mistake, but you know what I mean. I wonder if that was driven by the fact that it is a BW/CP cross, and CP is already in pink/purple... And it's good to have you back! |
||
March 21, 2007 | #52 | ||
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Anmore, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,970
|
Quote:
here is Robbins' writeup: Quote:
__________________
Tatiana's TOMATObase |
||
March 22, 2007 | #53 | ||
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,027
|
Quote:
My point is that they should not have changed my listing without asking me first. I submit that it was correctly classified as I had it (in 'other'): On the other hand, real/obvious mistakes like Anna's Noire (listed right below Ananas Noire) do not get corrected. I know the SSE isn't perfect, nor do I expect them to be. But I do wonder what the rationale is for what gets looked at, reviewed, changed, and why. |
||
|
|