January 5, 2011 | #16 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Anmore, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,970
|
Dear All,
All links to TOMATObase (new and old) should work for home computers, if you have not change any default firewall settings. If the link does not work for you, it likely means that your firewall blocks http traffic on port 88. If this is the case, please use a proxy server, i.e., http://helpmesurf.net/, or any other proxy server that Dice linked to in his post above. Just go to the proxy web page and type tatianastomatobase.com in the text box there. Our order system should also work. Let me know if it does not work for you. Thanks, Tatiana
__________________
Tatiana's TOMATObase |
January 6, 2011 | #17 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lancaster, California
Posts: 233
|
it seems to be blocked from my work and i can not use a proxy sever from a NAVY computer
|
January 6, 2011 | #18 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 4,743
|
Usually if your firewall simply unblocks tcp port 88, connects
to tatianastomabase.com will work the same as they always did for http connects to tcp port 80. The firewall usually does not care what application level protocol you are connecting with (http for the World Wide Web, ssh for encrypted logins and file transfer, smtp, pop-3, or imap connections to email servers, and so on). The firewall only cares what the destination port number is, whether the protocol underlying the application level protocol is tcp or udp (or rtp or whatever), and whether or not the destination ip address is specifically banned for some reason. Some firewalls are more sophisticated, inspecting packet headers and watching for things like a switch from tcp port 80 at a nominal destination address to some other port number at a real destination, and denying such sessions as inherently suspicious. edit: For anyone that thinks this "protocol" stuff is "all Greek", the document (.pdf) below provides an overview, so that even if one does not know any of the details, communication and signalling protocols are no longer a complete mystery: http://www.spinroot.com/spin/Doc/Book91_PDF/F1.pdf
__________________
-- alias Last edited by dice; January 6, 2011 at 01:03 PM. Reason: protocol note |
January 9, 2011 | #19 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 4,743
|
A little more on internet protocols and "port numbers":
So what are these "port numbers"? They basically work like post office box numbers. You can think of a network server as a kind of post office. It starts up server processes that "listen" for connections. Often there will be more than one listener. It may have a WWW server, an email (smtp) server, a Domain Name System (dns) server, a Secure Shell (ssh) login server, a Kerberos server (different kind of secure login system), a File Transfer Protocol (ftp) server, a Network Time Protocol (ntp) server, and so on. When it receives a request from a remote client at another machine, like a web browser, how does it know which listening process the remote user's client wants to connect to? That is what port numbers are for. When the WWW server process starts up, it typically tells the network server's operating system that it wants to listen on tcp ports 80 and/or 8080. When the email server starts, it tells the operating system that it wants to listen on tcp port 25. The DNS server listens on udp and/or tcp port 53. And so on for the other listening processes. Well-known and registered services have officially assigned port numbers from IANA ( http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers ), but the listening processes can ask the operating system to listen on any port that they specify (if two different server processes running on the same network server want to listen for connections to the same port at the same time, that does not work). You see this all of the time with online streaming audio. You connect to a WWW server serving streaming audio on tcp port 80 or 8080, and the server redirects your web browser to connect to some other arbitrary port number to receive the audio packet stream. It is using port numbers to seperate different audio streams that it is serving to different remote network clients at the same time (there are other ways to do this, seperating different client sessions internally that are all connecting to port 80, but forcing them to connect to different ports for different audio streams seems to be common practice). The remote client processes, the web browsers, email clients, etc, have their own port numbers, too, but those are usually assigned dynamically by the client's operating system when the client process requests a connection to a remote server. The client's operating system just picks a port number for that particular session at random from the high port number range, recycling those port numbers as short-lived client sessions end.
__________________
-- alias Last edited by dice; January 27, 2011 at 09:10 AM. Reason: minor detail |
January 27, 2011 | #20 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 660
|
I can't link using Firefox...it times out...problem is only at work and we have fast servers...I can get on using Google Chrome and a WIFI at home
|
January 27, 2011 | #21 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 4,743
|
Quote:
port 88 at any remote ip address. Yet when your web browser at work tries to connect to "tatianastomatobase.com" on tcp port 80 (standard WWW port), her ISP's dns server is redirecting that to "t.tatianastomatobase.com:88", which tells your web browser to resolve "t.tatianastomatobase.com" to a numerical ip address (via another dns query), then connect to tcp port 88 at that ip address, where the web server that hosts TOMATObase is listening. The network administrator thinking at your work is likely "we do not use Kerberos for authenticated login sessions or single sign-on cluster access or anything like that, so why do we need to let requests to connect to tcp port 88 (the standard Kerberos port number) at some remote ip address through our firewall? We are not authorized to allow that." Whereas they have been instructed to let out traffic to destination tcp ports 80 and 8080, so that their users can connect to remote WWW servers (educational resources, etc). I bet lots of online music streams from vtuner or shoutcast do not get through at work, either, not to mention file sharing "torrents" like BitTorrent. Your home firewall (the wifi router probably has a firewall, plus you probably have one in the network configuration of whatever operating system is installed on your home machine), on the other hand, has no such rule on what tcp port at a remote host your web browser can connect to, so the redirect to tcp port 88 poses no problem for your web browser. It would not matter whether the web browser was Firefox, Chrome, IE, Opera, Safari, or any other WWW browser. The blocked connect is happening in between the client (your web browser at work) and the remote server (the WWW server that hosts TOMATObase), at a firewall designed to filter out connections to unauthorized remote ports (services listening on some tcp and/or udp ports at remote servers are insecure over the internet, some are just big computing resource wasters, some are used by spammers who want to recruit client machines as unwitting mail forwarders, and so on ad infinitum).
__________________
-- alias Last edited by dice; January 27, 2011 at 09:59 AM. Reason: clarity |
|
January 27, 2011 | #22 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 660
|
so in two words..."I'm screwed" ?
|
January 27, 2011 | #23 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Iowa Zone 5
Posts: 305
|
I had no trouble about 10-12 days ago and placed an order/received seeds all good. I mainly use Google Chrome, but today I cannot access Tatianas Tomatobase with any browser. I have made no changes on my end, so possibly this is an expanding problem (?)
-Randy
__________________
Tomatovillain |
January 27, 2011 | #24 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: zone 6b, PA
Posts: 5,664
|
I've also had trouble both yesterday and today, but on and off- sometimes ok, sometimes not.
|
January 27, 2011 | #25 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 660
|
now I get this at home
Quote:
|
|
January 27, 2011 | #26 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Idaho Zone 4
Posts: 536
|
I get the same message.
|
January 27, 2011 | #27 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allen Park, MI
Posts: 178
|
I too have been having trouble.
__________________
A world without tomatoes is like a string quartet without violins. ~Author Unknown~ |
January 27, 2011 | #28 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Southfield, Michigan
Posts: 318
|
Same here I am having trouble connecting. Internet Explorer gives me an error message, HTTP 403 Forbidden.
When doing a Google tomato name search I can get all the seed vendors but no reference to Tatianas Tomatobase |
January 27, 2011 | #29 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,150
|
Works fine here. I'm on a Mac - not sure if that makes a difference.
|
January 27, 2011 | #30 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Zone 7 Southern Oregon
Posts: 187
|
I'm in the same boat..access forbidden.I believe it must be an error on their server,and will no doubt be a temporary inconvenience.No problem accessing her site yesterday.
|
|
|