March 9, 2011 | #76 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 682
|
Quote:
__________________
tomatoprojects.blogspot.com |
|
March 9, 2011 | #77 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Landers, CA
Posts: 191
|
ray,
maybe you should try the gard'n gro water filter i have used one for the past 3 years the plants seem to love it, it connects to hose bibbs. they (the filter can be replaced) last for 20,000 gallons and they take out 85 % of clhorine, they cost $ 49.95 plus $ 5.98 shipping, they can be ordered at 866-438-3458. les |
March 9, 2011 | #78 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 4,064
|
les,
I read their literature and like the "redox" copper and zinc filter approach. As most Municipal Water systems today no longer use Chlorine, but have switched to a more long lasting Chloramine treatment, I wonder if this filter is likewise effective. There is no mention in their literature about removal of Chloramine. I do like the replaceable filter cartridge approach, as after the initial purchase, re-use is only $10.00 per cartridge (2 for $17.00 on Amazon). http://www.amazon.com/Rainshowr-Gard...9696204&sr=8-1 Do you have any information on the Chloramine issue? See this Tomatoville Thread: http://www.tomatoville.com/showthrea...light=chlorine Raybo |
March 9, 2011 | #79 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Landers, CA
Posts: 191
|
ray,
i know the gard'n gro does not take out the chloramine but neither does the watts unit the reason i posted was that the gard'n gro has hose fittings both in and out, i just thought it would be easyer to use it without having to get extra fittings to use it. les |
March 9, 2011 | #80 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 4,064
|
les,
According to the Watts folks, it does remove Chloramine. In the thread I referenced above, here is a reply from the Company spokesperson in Feb 2009, when I emailed them the question: Got an email reply from the Watts Company today re: the capabilities of the one I purchased (in the initial post). Here's what they say: ""That filter is meant to filter chlorine. It will filter out chloramine, but it may not last long. Depending on how much water passes through the filter, it may only last up to a year instead of the "up to 5 years". The filter is a GAC ( granular activated carbon ) filter. Thanks, Stan"" So, I am encouraged.... Ray Well, I think in that case since the Gard'n gro specifically does not address the Chloramine issue, that I'll stick with the Watts product. Les, thanks for alerting us to this alternate product, however. Raybo |
March 10, 2011 | #81 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: sc
Posts: 339
|
Raybo,
Thanks for explaining you were not filtering previously and reminding me you have and need to use municipal water, as do I... But now I wondering if your own masterful trials have answered the question about whether the chloramine kills the beneficials. Your side by side with the Biotamax on the snow peas sure seemed to indicate the Biotamax worked.....also, you've previously said you've gotten better results with the Mycogrow and Actinovate, enough so that you've used them repetitively. So, it would seem to me you've already proven that beneficials survive chloramine and work well?? The only question remaining perhaps is whether the chloramine does detract from the effect of the beneficials, until the chloramine is deactivated? And maybe the way to overcome the amount the chloramine detracts is to simply add more beneficials than recommended? Tom |
March 10, 2011 | #82 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: May 2008
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,212
|
I've taken the plunge. This morning I planted out and in 1/2 the tainers I used Ami's dip method with a combination of Mycogrow, Biomax and actinovate and in the other 1/2 used a combination of Mcyogrow, Roots Organics Oregonismsxl and Actinovate. This is a very small sample size, but I will follow it to see if any obvious differences appear. One already did. In the "brew" that included the Roots Organics, when I put that in the bucket of water it started to bubble as if it was teeming with life. (and hopefully not at all like it was having a negative reaction to the other beneficials)
Dewayne Mater |
March 10, 2011 | #83 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 4,064
|
Quote:
That is the REAL question! Sure, the Biota Max and MycoGrow did indeed survive using ordinary tap water containing Chloramines, but the fundamental questions is: Would the Snow Peas treated with the two myco products have done even better if I had used water NOT containing Chloramine. I think an interesting "Myth-Busters Challenge" would be to water one 'Tainer with (unfiltered) municipal tap water; and an identical 'Tainer with the same tomato plant variety and fertilizer, watered through the Watts filter. As I've already got all of the 'Tainers set up this Season watered with filtered water, I won't be conducting this specific "A/B" comparison - - but maybe next year..... Raybo |
|
March 10, 2011 | #84 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: sc
Posts: 339
|
Raybo,
And that's the "challenge" I'll be waiting to see (and I may not be alone)...sure it's too late to unhook one of those tainers of yours and run an unfiltered water source to it so we won't have to wait until next year?... Tom |
March 10, 2011 | #85 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SE Florida Zone 10
Posts: 319
|
There is a product called AmQuell that can be added to water that will remove chloramines and not harm plants or fish. See description.
http://www.novalek.com/kordon/amquel/index.htm The other option is a granular activated carbon filter provided sufficient contact time. |
March 10, 2011 | #86 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 4,064
|
kevin,
Thanks for the link. The ingredients then appear to be: Pisolithus tinctorius - 80,000 propagules / gram Scleroderma cepa - 12,500 propagules / gram Scleroderma citrinum - 12,500 propagules / gram Glomus intraradices - 8.6 propagules / gram Glomus aggregatum - 11 propagules / gram Glomus mosseae - 10 propagules / gram Trichoderma harzianum - 66,625 Trichoderma konigii - 187,500 Bacillus subtilis - 275,000 cfu / gram Bacillus licheniformis - 275,000 cfu / gram Bacillus azotoformans - 275,000 cfu / gram Bacillus megaterium - 275,000 cfu / gram Bacillus coagulans - 275,000 cfu / gram Bacillus pumilus - 275,000 cfu / gram Bacillus thuringiensis - 275,000 cfu / gram Bacillus stearothermiphilis - 275,000 cfu / gram Paenibacillus polymyxa - 275,000 cfu / gram Paenibacillus gordonae - 275,000 cfu / gram Paenibacillus durum - 275,000 cfu / gram Azotobacter polymyxa - 275,000 cfu / gram Azotobacter chroococcum - 275,000 cfu / gram Streptomyces griseus - 275,000 cfu / gram Streptomyces lydicus - 275,000 cfu / gram Pseudomonas aureofaciens - 275,000 cfu / gram Pseudomonas florescence - 275,000 cfu / gram Deinococcus erythromyxa - 275,000 cfu / gram Seems to be more "comprehensive" than either Myco Grow or Biota Max. Someone smarter than I will have to weigh in to advise if these are applicable to tomato production. Raybo |
March 11, 2011 | #87 | |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Littlerock, CA
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
|
|
March 11, 2011 | #88 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Germany 49°26"N 07°36"E
Posts: 5,041
|
The microbials in both products are very similar. It's the other ingredients in "Oregonism XL" that are of interest.
Humic Acid 3% Indole3 Butyric Acid Naphthaleneacetic Acid Phosphorous Acid (Used in EXEL LG) Kelp 5% (Self explanatory) Vitamin B1 (Self Explanatory) Polyacrylamide Yucca Extract - 25% (Self Explanatory) Humic Acid: Increase root vitality Addition of organic matter to organically-deficient soil Improved nutrient uptake Increased chlorophyll synthesis Better seed germination Increased fertilizer retention Stimulate beneficial microbial activity Healthier plants and improved yields Addition of organic matter to organically-deficient soil Indole-3-butyric acid: Enhances the growth and development of food crops and ornamentals when applied to soil, cuttings, or leaves. Because it is similar in structure to naturally occurring substances and is used in tiny amounts, this plant growth regulator poses no known risks to humans or the environment. Naphthaleneacetic acid: NAA is a plant hormone in the auxin family and is an ingredient in many commercial plant rooting horticultural products; it is a rooting agent and used for the vegetative propagation of plants from stem and leaf cutting. It is also used for plant tissue culture. Polyacrylamide: One of the largest uses for polyacrylamide is to flocculate or coagulate solids in a liquid. It looks like from the "Other Ingredients" that the pre-plant dip containg "Oregonism XL" will out perform the pre-plant dip containing "MycoGrow Soluable. We shall see. Ami
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting ‘...Holy Crap .....What a ride!' |
March 13, 2011 | #89 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Abilene, TX zone 7
Posts: 1,478
|
I am planning to use the Biotamax, Mycogrow, and Actinovate dip when planting out. I was going to mix 2 tablespoons of soft rock phosphate (0-3-0) and some worm castings with the backfill of both inground and containers.
What about adding some molasses and fish/seaweed to the dip? Too much of a good thing? |
March 15, 2011 | #90 |
Tomatovillian™
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pacific North West, zone 8a
Posts: 510
|
Ami recommended actinovate, biota max, and mycrogrow to keep away late blight. Last year I got blight in august, and, being in Seattle, I hadn't got many ripe tomatoes. So this year I'm being extra careful... Has anyone else noticed less disease when using these fertilizers? Thanks for everyone who posted here! Good info.
Taryn |
|
|